Published: 09.12.2021
by Liina Joller
Purpose: In the conventional international health and safety policy design, the decision makers rarely think in terms of business models. As an example, the yellow paper-based vaccination certificates, initiated and implemented by the WHO in 1969, have not changed very much since then. In 2020, the Covid-19 crisis accelerated innovation, particularly digitalisation, in many sectors, and the sense of urgency to have a digital immunisation certificate was voiced by many governments, as well as corporations. The new solution must enable international interoperability, but it is a challenging task because the setup of health registries varies across countries and because the common actions have been hindered due to the lack of trust – the trust deficit.
Approach: In this article, the case is discussed in the platform business model framework, and the role of trust in gaining competitive advantage – the trust advantage – in its fast and widespread adoption is particularly exemplified. The case was analysed in parallel with the discussions and actual development, not ex post, as common in business model literature.
Findings: The solution that could be capable of overcoming the privacy and security concerns that have been brought up in the international discourse can be described as a decentralised multisided platform, which has a distributed management system. The platform’s standardisation would ease its global uptake, and the strategic partnerships with countries, organisations, and firms that are already considered trustworthy (possess trust credit) will have the opportunity to gain trust advantage.
Limitations: This paper was written having the managerial perspective in mind, hence, it does not go deeply into all technical and legal aspects affecting the implementation of the digital vaccination certificate platform. It was written in parallel with the vivid disputes in the international arena. By the time this article was finished, the first pilots had just taken off and it was not clear yet which of the technical solutions and business models will eventually
become dominant.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5278/jbm.v9i4.6580
Download paperAuthor: Esko Hakanen
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: business models , platforms , ecosystems
Author: Peter Kesting
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: Business Model , status quo , intertia , innovation , routine , theory of the firm
Authors: Myrthe Velter , Verena Bitzer , Nancy M.P. Bocken , Rene Kemp
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: Thick Description , Longitudinal Research , Boundary work , Sustainable Business Model Innovation , Circular Business Model Innovation , Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Authors: Seppo Yrjölä , Petri Ahokangas , Marja Matinmikko-Blue
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: Action research , business ecosystem , Business Model , Platform
Authors: Carlo Bagnoli , Francesca Dal Mas , Helena Biancuzzi , Maurizio Massaro
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: paradoxes , post-pandemic business models , covid-19
Author: Nedo Bartels
Published: 09.12.2021
Issue: Vol 9, No 4 (2021)
Keywords: Business Model Innovation (BMI) , Business Model Patterns , business model dimensions , construction kit